Criminal | Offences Against The Person
Voluntary Manslaughter: Diminished Responsibility
Flash Card | A Level
Downloaddata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42abc/42abcb28e7425adf8fc2a5ddc3505e98ffe98d3a" alt="Adobe PDF Icon"
bits of law
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98d86/98d866e6c1f5bbbbc99ca5e982c9f8cde5fe2133" alt=""
Voluntary Manslaughter: Diminished Responsibility
[Flash Card 1 of 3]
- D would otherwise be guilty murder / plead partial defence / guilty of manslaughter / more sentencing discretion
- introduced / extend limited insanity (S2(1) Homicide Act 1957 (HA 1957)) / amended by S52 CJA 2009
- abnormality mental functioning / recognised medical condition / substantially impair reasoning
Abnormality of Mental Functioning:
- abnormality of mental functioning / replaces old term abnormality of mind
- Lord Parker / defined abnormality of mind /
.. a state of mind so different from that of ordinary human beings that the reasonable man would term it abnormal..
(Byrne) - likely same standard of abnormality / test D's mental functioning so different from ordinary / reasonable man term it abnormal
Recognised Medical Condition:
- broad / physical & psychological conditions
- pre-menstrual tension (English) / post natal depression (Reynolds) / Battered Woman's Syndrome (Ahluwalia)
- medical evidence must confirm / abnormality of mental functioning / caused by recognised medical condition
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3d90/b3d9076084aebdb084ba9aca064d3ea273cedd74" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98d86/98d866e6c1f5bbbbc99ca5e982c9f8cde5fe2133" alt=""
Voluntary Manslaughter: Diminished Responsibility
[Flash Card 2 of 3]
Substantially Impair:
- D's abnormality of mental functioning / must substantially impair mental responsibility for conduct / term unchanged from HA 1957
- substantial not mean total nor minimal / jury to decide / question of fact judge may withdraw point from jury / if no evidence (Lloyd)
- impairment must be / understanding nature of his conduct / forming a rational judgement / exercising self control
- understand nature conduct / D is acting automatically / not aware of his conduct / suffering delusions or severe learning difficulties
- form rational judgement / D does know nature of conduct / cannot form rational judgement / suffering paranoia or schizophrenia (Martin)
- exercise self control / D sexual psychopath strangled and mutilated V (Byrne)
- must be proved / substantial impairment / provides an explanation for D's conduct / causal connection introduced (CJA 2009)
- abnormality of mental functioning / not need to be only factor / must be a substantial one
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3d90/b3d9076084aebdb084ba9aca064d3ea273cedd74" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98d86/98d866e6c1f5bbbbc99ca5e982c9f8cde5fe2133" alt=""
Voluntary Manslaughter: Diminished Responsibility
[Flash Card 3 of 3]
Intoxication:
- general rule / intoxication cannot support diminished responsibility
- alcohol or drugs not sufficient / to amount to injury (medical condition) / effect transient (Di Duca)
- abnormality of mental functioning / must be caused by recognised medical condition / wording strengthens /limits jury discretion (CJA 2009)
- further complications / D suffers some abnormality of mental functioning & intoxicated / D must satisfy jury abnormality of mental functioning substantially impaired mental reasoning / at time of the killing
- Lord Hutton /
.. the important question is: did that abnormality substantially impair his mental responsibility for his acts in doing the killing?..
(Dietschmann) - D intoxicated may be irrelevant (Robson) (Hendy)
- further consideration / if D suffering from drug or alcohol addiction & dependency / key factor control over intoxication
- Alcohol Dependence Syndrome (ADS) / recognised medical condition / sufferer cannot control their drinking
- D was an alcoholic / drunk nearly a whole bottle of vodka before killing / D's murder conviction upheld / evidence showed D exercised control over drinking that day (Tandy)
- voluntariness / whether D's alcohol dependency caused brain damage / important in jury directions (Wood) (Stewart)
- jury must consider / was D suffering from abnormality of mental functioning / was this caused by ADS / was D's mental responsibility substantially impaired / was abnormality cause or significant factor in causing D to kill V
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3d90/b3d9076084aebdb084ba9aca064d3ea273cedd74" alt=""