Tort | Negligence
Pure Economic Loss: Rules
Flash Card | Degree
Download bitsoflaw.orgbits of law
Pure Economic Loss: Rules
[Flash Card 1 of 2]
- general rule: D not owe duty of care to C not to cause pure economic loss (PEL) / loss not recoverable
- limited duty situation / only recover exceptionally / if sufficiently proximate relationship between C & D
- consequential economic loss: if C suffers personal injury or property damage / recoverable / PEL: loss not consequential from personal injury or damage to property
Damage to a third party's property
- C suffers PEL / due D negligently damaging 3rd party's property / no proximity D & A / no duty owed / PEL not recoverable
- factory power cut / D damaged 3rd party power cable / recover: physical property damage (melt) & consequential (melt loss profit) / not: profit of potential production (PEL) / policy limit D's liability (Spartan Steel v Martin [1973])
No physical damage
- PEL / no damaged property / not recoverable
- cattle market closure / PEL / not recoverable (Weller v Foot & Mouth Disease Research Institute [1966])
bits of law
Pure Economic Loss: Rules
[Flash Card 2 of 2]
Defective goods or property
- general rule: defective goods claim / under contract law / not tort
- flats structural damage / council negligent approval plans & inspection / HoL: recoverable / material damage to property / controversial: no contract / traditional: property damage only existing property & here original defective (Anns v Merton LBC [1978])
- defective flooring new factory / negligent sub contractor / recover: confirmed Anns v Merton LBC [1978] property damage definition (Junior Books v Veitchi [1983])
- decisions criticised: floodgates even if D & C no relationship / tort action interferes & undermines contract law
Murphy v Brentwood DC [1991]
- new build house / defective foundation design / repair: £45 000 / sold unrepaired £35 000 less market value / council negligently approved plans
- HoL: not recover / defective when acquired so PEL / overrules Anns v Merton LBC [1978]
- building structural damage / not apply complex structure theory: if component defective & damages whole property then classed as property damage
- Lord Bridge:
.. in the absence of a special relationship of proximity imposing on the tortfeasor a duty of care to safeguard the plaintiff from economic loss...
/ distinguished Junior Books v Veitchi [1983]: exception satisfied / special relationship due to discussions - PEL for defective goods / recover in tort / only if special relationship between C & D (duty of care owed)
bits of law